ic_007 · Industry: Education — course-dropout prediction

Status: ✓ Passing · Last run: 2026-06-07T07:16:32 · Pipeline: v2 · History: 1/1 runs passed (100%)

What was tested

Education — course-dropout prediction Dropout prediction: students + courses + grades + attendance + labels. Signal: low attendance + declining grades.

What we planted in the data

What the system did

Top features by importance:

What we checked — all assertions passed

Status Assertion Detail
no_pipeline_errors clean run
feature_survival_rate_above 18/29 features survived (62% ≥ 40%)
source_tables_contributing_above 5 distinct source-table prefixes in surviving features (['attendance', 'major', 'prior', 'score', 'year'])
auc_in_band AUC = 0.773 inside band [0.55, 0.95]

How this could have gone wrong

(no assertion descriptions provided)

Why this case matters

Industry-canonical ML problem; multi-table shape mirrors real customer datasets.

Reproducing

# from auto_insight_api/
python -m validation.v2 run ic_007 --pipeline v2 -v

← back to validation report